The three on-demand analyses — which to use when
AI discovery runs on its own. On top of it, three deeper analyses run only when you ask for them, from the buttons on a post's detail view. Each answers a different question:
- Intelligence brief — why does this post work? A structured deconstruction of how a winning post is built, and what's reusable.
- Comments intelligence — what is the audience saying? Five layers pulled from the post's comment section.
- Custom analysis — your own angle. One prompt your agency writes once, run on any post.
Which to reach for
| You want to know… | Use | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Why a winner works and what's portable | Intelligence brief | A 7-section strategist read of the post |
| What the audience wants, objects to, asks | Comments intelligence | 5 audience layers from real comments |
| Something specific to your agency's method | Custom analysis | Freeform output shaped by your own prompt |
A short way to hold it: Brief = why it works · Comments = what to say · Custom = your angle.
What they share
All three open in the same post modal, run in about a minute or two, and show only their latest result. Re-running replaces what was there rather than stacking a history.
Each one runs on your own Gemini account — and for Comments, your Apify account too — so every run carries a small, real cost billed to those accounts. Only runs that finish successfully count toward your monthly usage — see when an analysis fails for what a failure does and doesn't cost.
They all read the source media directly and stay honest about what they can see: none of them will claim a post "went viral" or predict performance, because Huntit holds no such data on the analyzed post. See the ground rules for why.
Two of them share one limit. On a video over the 5-minute AI-analysis limit, the brief and custom analysis aren't offered at all — a short note stands where their buttons would be.
Comments intelligence still runs there. It reads the comments, not the video.